Permalink

“We live in time—it holds us and moulds us—but I’ve never felt I understood it very well. And I’m not referring to the theories about how it bends and doubles back, or may exist elsewhere in parallel versions. No, I mean ordinary, everyday time, which clocks and watches assure us passes regularly: tick-tock, click-clock. Is there anything more plausible than a second hand? And yet it takes only the smallest pleasure or pain to teach us time’s malleability. Some emotions speed it up, others slow it down; occasionally, it seems to go missing—until the eventual point when it really does go missing, never to return.”
—Julian Barnes, The Sense of an Ending
This was one of those novels I wanted to read as soon as I had the chance to do so. After receiving it in the mail days before Christmas, I dove in.
More than any other contemporary writer I’ve read, Julian Barnes is a British representation of Lost Generation writers. I think my fascination for their themes and styles exceeds reasonable measure to stay on topic here. Even though it’s not holistically historical fiction, Julian Barnes’ The Sense of an Ending plays with the very concept of time and history—defining and refining it while addressing its significance in the life of the narrator.
Written in first-person narration, the novella is branded as a psychological thriller. I didn’t expect anything haunting or scary as the term implied, but eventually my exposure to the genre definitely confirmed its meaning. At times, the narrator doesn’t allow the reader to cultivate empathy for him, causing the reader to have a disinterest in the narrator’s character, but not a disinterest in the story itself. With this effect, I only wanted to read more and more to see how the story would transition. Perhaps this is representative of the type of response that people generate when hearing of other people’s issues in a particular way, i.e. when being exposed to the temporary depths of how poor of a condition the person’s character, the person’s approach to the world, and the person’s stance on living is actually in. Although I’m speaking of only a fraction of the novel, the author definitely constructs this well.
The narrator often gave the impression of an average person with the passivity for two. At the onset, there’s certainly isn’t anything remarkable about his aim to maintain “peacefulness” in life; it’s simply an inflated word for being stubborn. What I think really matters here, however, is his insistence to seek truth. This was like a ‘coming-of-age novel,’ but built up with more than the typical dimensions and the average content that the term implies. The narrator is a British man that shows in his typical life that all actions—or the lack thereof—make a difference as people conduct their lives in the boundaries of human experience. Because whether we recognize them or not, life does have boundaries. (Feel free to ask me about this.)
For a while, the novel justifies suicide. And, for a while, this didn’t sit too well with me. But as I further developed an understanding of the narrator’s character as the novel unraveled, his willingness to justify the suicide of a friend only underscores his own insistence to take life as it comes, rather than taking action by either using or ending life, the gift that no one asked for. Because, in a sense, a passive life is a suicidal life.
Read More